Primer Question 7. A 35-year-old woman with chronic dyspepsia had a normal EGD 1 year ago. Unfortunately, biopsies were not obtained at the time of EGD. She now has a positive serological test for H. pylori and consults you regarding possible treatment. Her symptoms persist and have not changed recently. What do you advise?
Incorrect. The correct answer is 3. The patient probably has functional dyspepsia – long duration of symptoms / normal EGD. Biopsies should have been taken at EGD. Unfortunately, for some reason, they were not. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection should not be based only on a positive serological test. While serology has good negative predictive value (i.e., a “negative” result is probably a true negative), its positive predictive value in this country is unacceptably low. Therefore, a positive serological test should be confirmed with a test of active infection – either a urea breath test or a fecal antigen test. On that basis, option 1 is incorrect; treatment should not be initiated at this stage but should be based on a test of active infection. (As an aside, this triple combination should NOT be used for H. pylori infection unless it is known that the patient‘s H. pylori strain is clarithromycin-sensitive.) Option 2 is also incorrect; this patient may have H. pylori infection. That needs to be confirmed with a test of active infection. If she is H. pylori-positive, she should be offered treatment. It would be premature to conclude that treatment for H. pylori infection is unnecessary. Empiric treatment with a PPI might help her symptoms (assuming she had not tried this before, which seems unlikely). However, determination of H. pylori status takes precedence – and empiric use of a PPI would interfere with the ability to do that with a urea breath test or fecal antigen test.
Ref: The 2017 ACG and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology joint guideline. Management of Dyspepsia. Moayyedi PM et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 988 – 1013
Correct. The patient probably has functional dyspepsia – long duration of symptoms / normal EGD. Biopsies should have been taken at EGD. Unfortunately, for some reason, they were not. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection should not be based only on a positive serological test. While serology has good negative predictive value (i.e., a “negative” result is probably a true negative), its positive predictive value in this country is unacceptably low. Therefore, a positive serological test should be confirmed with a test of active infection – either a urea breath test or a fecal antigen test. On that basis, option 1 is incorrect; treatment should not be initiated at this stage but should be based on a test of active infection. (As an aside, this triple combination should NOT be used for H. pylori infection unless it is known that the patient‘s H. pylori strain is clarithromycin-sensitive.) Option 2 is also incorrect; this patient may have H. pylori infection. That needs to be confirmed with a test of active infection. If she is H. pylori-positive, she should be offered treatment. It would be premature to conclude that treatment for H. pylori infection is unnecessary. Empiric treatment with a PPI might help her symptoms (assuming she had not tried this before, which seems unlikely). However, determination of H. pylori status takes precedence – and empiric use of a PPI would interfere with the ability to do that with a urea breath test or fecal antigen test.
Ref: The 2017 ACG and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology joint guideline. Management of Dyspepsia. Moayyedi PM et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 988 – 1013